As I just got problems in explaining my concept, I developed
another text to a Physician.
Conception of an email of 01-10-2000 to a Drs. of physics,
editors of journals. I didn't post it, because there all
my principles are opened. They show the obstinacy with what
main-stream physics believe in their principles, although it
had to see that they are wrong if it was attentive.
"Dear Mr. Dr. ...,
... In principle I don't negate theories. Interpretations
are changed by me. But alone this is enough for experts
removing away from me. Why do they do this? 1. Wordings of great
physicians are requested in the end. The stability of present
physics stopped with Heisenberg, Born, De Broglie and Hawking
would go lost. Almost all the scientists exclusively Prof.
Linde (Stanford University) think it must be improbable that
something like my work could be true. And they don't answer my
emails, too. Unfortunately in determined times paradigms are
put into release radically. This fact comes with big
probability. Who doesn't know expecting this will come along
to the release of history. 2. It may be better to ignore a
complete solution, because one could become unemployed by this
solution. 3. No, but no, publication of my ideas is possible.
Just here in www.arcusuniverse.com
Einstein hoped, one might find a solution from his theory,
which would make unification possible and lead to a world
formula. I assumed that Einstein already had this world formula.
He didn't know it. This formula is still seen if one has
solved all the other problems doing detailed work (I needed 12
years doing it), and then one looks in which function this is
already reflected abstractly. Simply then one finds
Schwarzschild's solution and one interprets its terms to be a
unity of universe and its physics and its philosophy, but
still in the end after discovering the light in tunnel
clearly.
Before I did this, I found the expected solution of General
Relativity Theory. It says that all the cosms are
oscillating Black White Holes, so the macrocosm and all the
microcosms - exactly they are oscillators/ resonators. The universe is a
hierarchy of all these oscillators. They are distinguished
into divergently closed (unstable, a state of it is
temporarily open) and convergently closed (stable, they can be
destabilized). Now I took such a cosmos and set Planck's
constant quantum into its mathematical solution. A very
interesting system resulted, how every cosm is made out of
quantum numbers and unstable Black White Holes partially
decaying into stable particles. This way, stable states become
primary and unstable states become inexhaustibly secondary.
Some consequences followed:
- All the stable particles have a geometric dimension.
Therefore, protons, electrons and neutrinos have a primary
character (the universe is the largest stable particle).
They carry the special mass while their surfaces are
vibrating. Better: The whole body is in vibrating
movement. With it, the origin of the matter is moving
along. This reflection creates the resting MASS of the
cosms.
- Now a simple dualism of wave and particle could not
remain at all. That problem had to be interpreted in a new way
without touching the present measurements and laws.
- Additionally, electrical elementary charge seems to be a
pendent of an elementary mass practically representing a
gravitation charge.
This way this picture of logic became a complex thesis:
- Two forces determine the universe: electromagnetism and
"gravitomagnetism", dependent on as follows:
- The movement of an electric charge makes an e.m. wave by
changing an electrically caused magnetic field and by
twisting the intrinsic polarizing of its real vacuum
(magons/ antimagons). Then the charge don't become a wave
itself. It is an oscillator.
- The movement of a mass makes a gravitomagnetic wave by
changing a gravitationally caused dipole field along
the vacuum, too. Then the mass itself does not become a wave.
But the moving mass is escorted of the
momentum of its intrinsic wave if it has an interaction.
Now these cohesion should be found. Results of
electrodynamics are known, then o.k.
Einstein predicted with General Relativity Theory that a
moving mass would make gravitation waves. The interpreters of
his theories sticked at the thought of spatial curvature, that
they could imagine this wave only being a vibrating of
curvature, but they could not think in an exchange wave of
wave momenta similar to e.m. waves. Nevertheless, the solutions of
General Relativity Theory describe gravitation waves
analogously to the light waves in state of transversal waves
of vacuum light velocity C.
- Interpretation error – De Broglie:
The destiny took its run so. Apparently, De Broglie
didn't read Einstein's theories exactly. As he found the
waves caused on movement of masses (in 1924), he baptized
them to be "matter waves". Never anybody thought
that these waves could be gravitation waves or
gravitomagnetic g. m. waves.
But matter waves really are the quantum mechanical
gravitation waves! Obviously, quantum physicists cannot
understand Einstein's theories completely if they are not
prepared to a unification concept in this thought. After
all, recently "matter waves" were proved at
fullerons. They "already" reach into the
macroscopic.
Starting from these theses, I have written a completely
new universe. All the riddles are able to be solved out of
the whole cohesion of this thesis. I myself solved just one
part.
But this structure is such a kind of new and different that
ignoramus cannot be friends whit it.
After all, this system gives a thesis that seems to be
disproved today:
If the electromagnetism is made by two kinds of charges, the
gravitomagnetism also should know a positive and a negative
mass.
The mass of positrons (and also of antiprotons) should be
negative. Practically, there would be antigravitation
between proton and antiproton. Between antiprotons, there would
be their own gravitation, a negative gravitation. General
Relativity Theory predicts such a state from
"stupidity" of Einstein's cosm constant lambda.
My solutions show the plausibility to start from negative
mass.
But now this idea seems to be disproved by two
experiments obviously. It was put to the files:
Particles and antiparticles of zero- kaons were
examined. One didn't find any contrary mass at them. My solutions
predict for particles that these kaons already consist of
each one electron and one positron state. The mass of a
kaon is only given as quantum effect. It really is a wave
momentum, a momentum mass like at photons, but now leading
to an apparently resting mass, although the particle was
never balanced in rest. So there are no contrasts between
the masses of kaons! At the inside of kaons the rest
masses of electrons are already compensated against the
positrons. So nobody could measure contrasts of rest
masses.
Nothing else will be left than to measure the mass of
positrons. On principle of my solutions, there will be one
plausible experiment at least. I am convinced that the
result will be the negative mass if I could make these
experiments.
Mathematically one thinks to be able to conclude from
inertia to heaviness directly. Inertial mass is the same as
heavy mass. Or are only their amounts the same? The inertial
behavior of antiparticles would be the same as particles. Is
then everything the same?
After my solution only the amounts are the same. The
cause of inertia is given by Mach’s thesis, which I prove
mathematically in my book: All the around-masses of the
finite universe determine the structure of gravitationally
exchange quanta. This looks like all masses would have
interconnecting cables to all the other masses, where they
would exchange their momenta of wave relations permanently.
The movement of one mass is dependent on internal
gravitation then. At the same time, it is a change of the
structure of the movement in this moment. This is the effect
of inertia. If now there are not only a movement structure
of all the positive masses but also such a structure of all
the negative masses, then the behavior of the negative
masses referred to its own inertia is the same as the
behavior of the "contrary" inertia!
Disproving the anti-heaviness over a non-given
anti-inertia, all the pure thoughts made in present are a
weak work therefore. Really they don't speak about high
intelligence.
(remark: the General Relativity Theory describes a state
of finite chaining of all the masses into a completely
curved system of their geodetic lines - this is a
black-hole-state and a limited state and it is not the
measurement of all the things. This means: gravitation waves
in big dimensions change the curvature, gravitation waves in
small dimensions change the curvature only a little, but
strongly close to them.
Nevertheless, they are quantum-effective exchange waves!
Logically: Big masses make a strong curvature. Small masses
make small curvatures.)
- Interpretation error: Heisenberg and Born
I noticed: one cannot catch a particle directly. Only its
momentum can be measured from its movement as an effect of
its wave caused by the particle. Therefore the position of a
particle