Features of Union of both Theories
Currently, many people think as follows:
1. The General Relativity Theory (GRT) would
be only a theory of gravitation of the macrocosm.
2. The Quantum Mechanics (QM) would only be
a theory of the atomic and subatomic area. Particles would be
like points, dots. Only their origin would lay in
"strings". Wave nature of matter especially comes
from dual nature of particles and waves. Heisenberg's
principle of uncertainty relation was interpreted as follows: Position and momentum
of the particle would not be concerned simultaneously with
perfect accuracy. Max Born gave conclusion: The square of the
amplitude would be a measurement of the probability of the
Concluding this, we see the particle equal
to a wave. At last, both became to one thing. You speak about light
particles and light waves as well as of electrons and
electron-waves. The particle and its momentum were bound to
is another Cohesion:
1. GRT: Because of Friedman-solution, there
are opened, closed and mixed cosmoses of gravitation, of
electromagnetic radiation and of both gravitation and ray.
It follows: GRT is valid for all kinds of
cosmoses from mass and from electromagnetism. One should find
further cosmoses to the macrocosm. I postulated and researched
that result positively: Each cosmoses are oscillating
harmonically, if they are closed. They exchange wavequanta
(impulses like momenta, quanta). Therefore, they are sending
and receiving stations of electromagnetic or/and gravity
My logic hypothesis is
Also microcosms are
taken to this. Therefore, particles do not only have a mass
point or a charge point. They oscillate into the space.
Consequently, they are not only "strings" at any
beginning of matter, but the complete matter is oscillating
Only this way, matter is able to origin and to exchange wavequanta. In this respect, particles are primary quanta. They
oscillate according to Planck's Constant h. So the complete matter
consists of oscillating black holes. Is the matter stable,
these holes are black; is it unstable, holes are open
sometimes or open completely. Black holes change to white holes, but not
in billions of years, but even in split seconds! That is the base
of my explanations of matter of macro- and of microcosm.
2. QM should change now some words of its
terminology. This would be its loose. The win was given in the
unity with the above shown oscillator-solution of GRT. What is
a) Particles aren't points anymore. They
have an expansion of space.
b) The mass point of a particle, which is
always moving on curved lines (GRT), originates the quantum
respectively the momentum and the amplitude of the wave of the
c) The amplitude of the particle wave does
not lay congruently to the radius of particle-movement. The
radius of particle-movement is not equal to the amplitude of
d) Werner Heisenberg newly
expressed by me: Amplitude and momentum of
particle's wavequantum are not concerned simultaneously with perfect
So the uncertainty relation is not yet related now at
the position of the particle, because this position is
absolutely not able to be indicated. The reason is: Only interactions
of momenta (wavequanta) are able to be indicated, and these are interactions
of wavequanta! If any quantum physicist could accept
this, we would be far at the top.
e) Max Born newly expressed
by me: The square of amplitude of
particle's wavequantum is a measurement of the probability
of interactions of wavequanta.
Thus, particles do not
interact themselves, but their wavequanta do this, their
momenta do so far away from the particles. The higher the
relativistic speed of indication, the more the interaction
coming close to the gravity point of the particle itself. This
way, it is yet meeting the subparticles before, which are inside this particle moving. So the particle, that position, is never
able to be indicated.
f) Matter now has no dual nature of particle
and wave, but the Unity Nature of Wavequantum and Wave (wave properties do
not include any contradiction).
What is the problem? Originally, one thought
in classic sense, momentum would belong into the physical body
directly respectively into the body. It seems to be so in
macroscopic areas, even though, there already the interaction
both of bodies with their momenta is laying beneath the
gravity point, too. The difference is such a small one at
non-relativistic speeds that it can be ignored. Just this
should not take anymore wanting a unity of both theories.
The momentum effect is not a direct part of the
position of the particle but of the position of the
This is the decision! If quantum theorists
would come along with me, there was nothing lost, but
everything won - the united view at the world!
None of the theories is wrong. No work of
physics was for nothing! Only some words were put newly. A few
relations were new. And the work of matter can be seen in a
different light. Of cause, these consequences are extensive.
want to enjoy of any further discussions?