Features of Union of both Theories
Until today one thinks:
1. The General Relativity Theory (GRT) would
be only a theory of gravitation for the macrocosm.
2. The Quantum Mechanics (QM) would only be
a theory for the atomic and subatomic area. Particles would be
like points. Only their origin would lay in
"strings". Wave nature of matter especially comes
from dual nature of particles and waves. Heisenberg's
uncertainty relation was interpreted as: Position and momentum
of the particle would not be concerned simultaneously with
perfect accuracy. Born gave conclusion: The square of the
amplitude would be a measurement of the probability of the
Concluding this, we see the particle equal
to a wave. At last both got to one. One speaks about light
particles and light waves as well as of electrons and
electron-waves. The particle and its momentum were bound to
1. GRT: Because of Friedman-solution there
are opened, closed and mixed cosmoses of gravitation, of
electromagnetic radiation and of both gravitation and ray.
It follows: GRT is valid for all kinds of
cosmoses from mass and from electromagnetism. One should find
further cosmoses to the macrocosm. I postulated and researched
that result positively: Each cosmoses are oscillating
harmonically, if they are closed. They exchange wave-quanta
(impulses like momenta, quanta). Therefore they are sending
and receiving stations of electromagnetic or/and gravity
My logic hypothesis: Also microcosms are
taken to this. Therefore particles do not only have a mass
point or a charge point. They oscillate into the space.
Following they are not only "strings" at any
beginning of matter, but the complete matter is oscillating!
Only this way matter is able to origin and to exchange wave
quanta. In this respect particles are primary quanta. They
oscillate after Planck-constant. So the complete matter
consists of oscillating black holes. Is the matter stable,
these holes are black; is it unstable, holes are open
sometimes or open. Black holes change to white holes, but not
in billions of years, but in split seconds! That is the base
of my explanations of matter of macro- and of microcosm.
2. QM should change now some words of its
terminology. This would be its loose. The win was given in the
unity with the above shown oscillator-solution of GRT. What is
a) Particles are no points anymore now. They
have an expansion of space. Therefore destiny and chance also
are not dot-like. This has far-reaching consequences!!!
b) The mass point of a particle, which is
always moving on curved lines (GRT), originates the quantum
respectively the momentum and the amplitude of the wave of the
c) The amplitude of the particle wave does
not lay congruently to the radius of particle-movement. The
radius of particle-movement is not equal to the amplitude of
d) Heisenberg new: Amplitude and momentum of
particle-wave are not concerned simultaneously with perfect
accuracy. The uncertainty relation is not yet related now at
the position of the particle, because this position is
absolutely not able to indicate. Reason: Only interactions
of momenta are able to indicate, and these are interactions
of wave quanta! If any quantum physicist could accept
this, we would be far at the top.
e) Born new: The square of amplitude of
particle wave or a wave itself is a measurement for the probability
of interactions of wave quanta. Thus particles do not
interact themselves, but their wave quanta do this, their
momenta do so, far away from the particles. The higher the
relativistic speed of indication, the more interaction is
coming near to the gravity point of the particle itself. This
way it is yet meeting the subparticles before, which are in
this particle moving. So the particle, that position, is never
able to indicate.
f) Matter now has no dual nature of particle
and wave, but unity nature of wave quantum and wave
respectively of momentum and wave (wave properties do
not include any contradiction).
What is the problem? Originally, one thought
in classic sense, momentum would belong into the physical body
directly respectively into the body. It seems to be so in
macroscopic areas, even though there already the interaction
both of bodies with their momenta is laying beneath the
gravity point too. The difference is such a small one at
non-relativistic speeds that it can be ignored. Just this one
should not do anymore thinking on unity of both theories.
The momentum is not a direct part of the
position of the particle but of the position of the
This is the decision! If quantum theorists
would come along with me, there was nothing lost, but
everything won - the united view at the world!
None of the theories is wrong. No work of
physics was for nothing! Only some words were put newly. A few
relations were new. And the work of matter can be seen in a
different light. Of cause, these consequences are extensive.
Any further discuss?