ARCUS:  The World Formula and its Solutions

Consequently constructed using the results of Albert Einstein and Max Planck leading to the Unified Field Theory

The Preaching

The Alternative Creation of the Earth

Earth's solid internal core and fluid external core cannot be formed from homogeneous matter

How has the Earth been formed? Was the beginning homogeneous or inhomogeneous? Has it arisen? Has it been formed?

Present facts:

The existence of the Earth's solid core may be physically impossible, if the prevailing theory is taken into the basic account. Therefore, the young Earth would have completely consisted of a homogeneous liquid about 4 billion years ago, and then it would have cooled off. Professor James Van Orman, Case Western Reserve University of Cleveland (USA) published the new essay. The sense is about as follows: this homogeneous matter could not form the solid Earth's core. The start condition would have had to be heterogeneous that it can arise. How should it have come to the inhomogeneity, however? This remains the question to the science. /Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X18300360?via%3Dihub/

First, one assumes at the Earth formation that the proto-sun, the proto-planets and proto-satellites have formed themselves from a rotating disk of gas and dust by contractions. At such a process, heterogeneous structures are hardly possible. Planetesimals rather lead to the homogeneity of the product.

Planetesimal-theory corresponds anyway with the cosmological theories of "arisings". The first "arising" shall have been the "Big Bang", which also leads to homogeneity.

The universe "arose" from such homogeneity. Galaxies were formed from exactly the same homogeneity by forming stars. First, there was hydrogen gas, dust od chemical elements, then rotated later from SN in the disks around the stars. Homogeneous concentrations changed into planets. Everything quite slowly, therefore, the objects always "resulted" from homogeneous states from something slowly, too, by themselves, so that it has time to "arise". Unfortunately, in the meanwhile, it was noticed that the formation of planets went much faster, anyway, and the necessary time for the actual theory is missing.

Consequently, these above told premises cannot be correct. This way, the universe does not work!

How does it work really then? This process, the "Unified Field Theory" (UFT) explains, which is based on the “world formula”. Albert Einstein found it already without knowing that it is one of a variety of world formulae.

From a solution of one of his formulae, an extended view arose from the things, which one also can call a "Unified Field Theory" in analogy to Einstein now. However, it is already one “solution to be able to understand the world in its unity", the "Unified World Solution" (https://www.arcusuniverse.com), remained without attention till now since 1986.

Why? Well, we wrote it above. Because the present opinion is marked of "arisings" from “homogeneities” and has not left any space for alternative solutions at all.

Now let us look at this special solution of mine.

The universe is quantized! It absolutely is not homogeneous from the beginning!

There was a Tiny Bang in the start. The “Big Bang” was tiny - the primary bang in the center. Starting out from the center, there was a variety of secondary bangs layer by layer upwards, many of parallel layers, but also one after the other until there was no more matter enough for further bangs. In this respect, a central space with an almost homogeneous gas matter resulted, which, however, has not produced the galaxies of universe. Conclusion: the single “Big Bang” alone has not formed the universe! It only formed a cold gas center - an expanded cold core and its radiation at 2.65 K.

Once again: inside an arbitrary area of a physical space was a variety of matter packages according to the sense of "Black White Holes", which but really are only "Dark Gray Holes".

The initial energy dispersed them into the space. The smallest of them got stuck in an almost homogeneous cloud in the center, called “Big Bang”, but really it is just a “Small Bang”. Gradually, bigger matter packages climbed up the amplitude and unfolded (evaporated) their matter (mass and radiation) at their locations in further bangs. It is explained below, why the bigger matter packages were flying more and more far away.

Above that central space, the areas lay from where the secondary bangs matter was installed, which locally formed themselves to galaxies, however, but not from one piece: the universe consists of a hierarchical structure of gas balls resp. matter packages. Within every gas ball, there again is an amount of gas balls etc. up to the smallest matter packages. That way, from the beginning, there a structure is programmed based on quantum numbers how we find them in an analogue in the electron shell of the atom, just there they are related to the same negative charge and stable particles.

Conclusion: stable pairs are considered in the atomic shell. However, inside of any cosmos (or any protocosm), there are unstable quadrupoles in space. In the electron shell of an atom, the main orbits arise over 2n˛ from inside to the outside (upwards).

In universe or in every secondary system analogue, the protocosms arise from the outer horizon to inside center over 4n˛. Consequently, that leads in the direction of the center of a cosmos or also within every matter package to the innumerable variety of matter packages and to the homogeneity itself, only in the centers, because this construction is a universal. And now you think, there was a homogeneous origin bang.

The packets. which hierarchically bind the matter, are unstable in space. In this respect, they just “correspond” to the theoretical ideal solution of the "Black Hole" in that special meaning that they have been unstable systems, formed out from the outside, never got really black (analogue: accelerated rest mass only divergently reaches the vacuum light velocity, while the gravitation horizon is forming itself only divergently reaches the horizon of the theoretical "Black Hole"). Stable particles like protons and electrons as well as the universe, however, are stable and non-stationary Black White Holes.

So protocosms are really "Dark Gray Holes", divergent to the "Black Hole", which are moved within a stable cosmos. No homogeneous matter but a system of quantized matter is inside of them. These unstable bodies are called no more “matter packages” but "protocosms" in the UFT. Any stable objects are called “cosms”.

While a limited time period, protocosms are forming them and after their running way (like an ideally theoretical “Worm Hole”), they are exploding (evaporating) also while a finite time period being such things like "White Holes". At their surface, the first radiation is shifted extremely against red. But these objects do not escape with light velocity. That way, not only the “Small Bang” is moved in the extreme red, but all the secondary bangs, too. The galaxies seem to escape from each other. But this is a wrong opinion. Cosmic objects were released at their locality. Consequently, they stay there with low relative speeds! Redshift has its origin from gravitational shifting. All, absolutely all the universal objects come out of “Dark Gray Holes” after their flight to their destinations!!

On base of the quantization, protocosms have the following construction: most gas particles become free in the center through which a certain homogeneity is formed. Bigger and bigger protocosms explode (evaporate) stratum for stratum, through what bigger and bigger objects are formed (galaxies, galaxy clusters, the galaxy arms etc.).

The system is universally applicable to any object structures. The universe, actually, is an informational system at the formation of a new solar system, where the same structure and quantization laws are valid on all places, as following:

While the implosion phase a supernova (SN) is forming a protocosm pair, which is shot out from the central SN-area into both directions. So it escapes firstly before the dust wave of the SN-shell blown follows it.

Is this not possible? Of course, it is! Protocosms pack (condense) its energy and mass temporarily below its horizon, as if it were zipped away. Following, the UFT inner and outer mass of a protocosm turned over proportional: M ~ k/ m. The inner mass M is the "Black Hole mass". The outer mass m is the Oscillation Mass, formed of the frequency f of the amplitude of the protocosm’s radial elongation (m = hf/ c˛; c light velocity, h Planck's Constant).

The larger a protocosm, the more matter M it transports inside while lower outer mass m. Through this, it can fly faster than the same kinetic initial energy of a mixture of different protocosms. As soon as they open up themselves (evaporate), the conservation of momentum leads to the stop of the flight (I = mv '= Mv"; v" << v').

A protocosm, which escapes from a SN, therefore, has an extremely low mass m similarly to a neutrino. It does hardly interact gravitationally with the SN core. This way it comes free from center running that place, at which it explodes and installs a virgin solar system from out setting M. So in the beginning. the complete proto-structure consists of a structure of hydrogen gas balls including a litte bit helium, the proto-sun, the proto-planets, the proto-satellites and the sub-proto-satellites etc. For the attention: this protocosm at its opening formed out the proto-sun in the center and the proto-planets and everyone out suddenly. Because of ejecting the protos elliptical orbits were formed. Don't forget, we have a twin on the other side of the SN!

Above the center, rotation systems (Sub-sub .sub) are becoming smaller and smaller. One also could say: there. the future Earth was like a skeleton in hydrogen portions. Every component of it was regarded as a condensation shot. It could cool down and capture matter and justify that heterogeneity.

Proto-sun and proto-planets as well as proto-satellites etc. are formed at the same time. At first, they were fine structured gas balls. They wait here until the SN cloud of dust arrived following down now for its fertilization by the sperm cell like the egg in the uterus, which has partly caught in the area of the proto-systems and their orbits.

The dust settles at the structures of the proto-gas-planets, is captured by them, then it cools down and forms solid central cores not only in the center of the future planet but also in all centers of the tangle buzzing round of gas balls of the structure hierarchy of its quantization order.

Skeleton-objects got heavier, and soon, they throw into the center. Remained dust was bound. The proto-planets grow by gas and solid matter. They resemble the gas giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, however, but they are cool with solid cores. And they are located relatively near the sun.

After the ignition of the proto-sun, which went through its own concentration to the known T-Tauri-stage in the same time period as the proto-planets. (Remark: The Sun is not a homogeneous gas ball either but has structures, which are rotating, submerging and appearing again in the gas of the Sun until its surface and higher).

The proto-Mercury, at first, it was a gas-proto-planet like the uranus-class, is burned by the radiation to a small core. Its satellites are blown away as also from Venus, Earth and Mars. The fragments of the proto-satellites form the asteroid belt collected above Mars’ orbit. Mars has captured two parts of them having now both moons. Planetoids move at extreme elliptical orbits since then. They also originate from the inner proto-satellites. One of it was captured by the Earth.

The gas of the Sun's eruption and the gasses blown away from the inner proto-planets were collected from Jupiter to Uranus mainly at the Jupiter and its satellites and sub-satellites of the hierarchy. Therefore, the Jupiter has the matter maximum.

What was captured more now? Water, iron, sulfur etc.? This is to understand by chance, because in space runs a causal process of the situation of the SN and all consequences, however. So the proto-core of the proto-earth has got much more iron than other cores. So the cores, which were flying in the environment of the Earth's core, respectively, have got other compositions. Consequently, the skeleton of the proto-earth became heterogeneous. After capturing matter, the proto-structures became heavier at almost base momentum that they could not hold on to dropping speed at their orbits around the core anymore and fell down. So, the completely heterogeneous body of the earth arose.

During the extreme radiation eruption by T-Tauri, the burning strength of the young Sun had inflamed the upper area of the young Earth (and accelerated the Earth at the same time to larger orbit). So a liquid environment, which cooled off at its surface, arose above a remained solid core: the Earth like we know it now. Actually, it would have remained without water and would be a dry planet.

Result: The heterogeneity at the development of planets and other cosmic objects is caused by the “installation by protocosms”.

Admittedly, the story still goes on! In the active time around our Sun, furthermore it hailed objects from SN and aqueous objects from the dust disk. But also "protocosm-showers" arrived the Earth. They took structure elements to the young Earth, through what the development of lives, country and water went considerably faster as one assumes. At that time, offers of life teemed, which found their own developments under the given conditions only in such a way. Provided that the conditions changed, it died out or managed to adapt. So, life did not “arise”, but either it was first installed by protocosms unlimitedly variously and then selected by the conditions. In this respect, life was offered on every planet in the complete universe, too, especially on our twins. Where it could survive, there it stayed. And: every Star must have planets while that time of its origin!

The principle opinion of the universe is changed totally using the UFT. If you go along this Unified Theory or you prefer to remain explanations by chance, anyway, at collisions of "Black Holes" to explain Quasars e.g., the mankind may do what it would like to do.

Heinz-Joachim Ackermann

February, 24th, 2018



· All rights reserved: Arcus (Heinz-Joachim Ackermann, since1998) ·