The
Time as Fourth Dimension?
Is this a Correct Idea? One question, else: what is a dimension?
Different explanations are given.
Firstly, you see a physical magnitude being a dimension.
Secondly, the number of coordinates is explained as
dimensions for the description of the space.
I have recognized that the space-coordinates x, y and z
explain and make each of the other physical dimensions, if they
are immediately bound at their time functions tx, ty
and tz and if they form a system of oscillating or
vibrating states. This is the process, they are doing, because the world
consists of wavequanta and oscillators/ resonators!
While each velocity is basically bound to the functions of
r = v t, the relation is given, too: light velocity = wave
length / period time = amplitude / radial oscillation time of
a spherical wave (spherical Tesla-wave) = c = l
/ t = Ro / to.
Mass and energy, my theory explains only to be a function
of spherical oscillation of both space and time. Therefore,
there the time is not the fourth coordinate, but a magnitude,
which is coupled at these three space coordinates, which are
exchangeable against them. The world would have only three
coordinates, if it would not consist of locked worlds, of
particles (additionally, of subparticles as locked sub-worlds)
and if it wouldn't be itself a locked and oscillating particle
as macrocosm. Do you ask why?
The total border of a world forces its coordinate system to
return inside of this world. Another interpretation: All the
coordinates are just as curved, that they - seen along larger
and universal distances - turn around and that they do not run
into eternity!
Imagine like x, y and z would make a cuboid continually getting
larger. The sites don't stay straight. The larger a cuboid the
more crooked are his sites. Sometimes, somewhere - in cosmos
at about 6 billion light years according to my theory - they have
reached a circular arc, which takes the way back to the
starting point. Consequently, the cuboid itself becomes a sphere
at last. I tell you now: all the body shapes are inside of the big
universe sphere. The sphere is a three-dimensional body. Even,
if you choose polar coordinates, you have to give three
magnitudes: the length of the ray and two angles, which lead
the ray.
If two worlds are totally isolated from each other, because
each world has its own internal coordinate system, then you
cannot travel between both worlds. And but there must be a
fourth coordinate, which couples the system of all the worlds
into a superordinated world. This again is a coordinate from
way and time, but which are bound with the imaginary
magnitude j in the equations.:
Ri²=c² j²ti² or Ri²=
- c²ti². If you want to extract the root from it
to get a clear description of the space-coordinate R, so you
only get Ri = c j ti. This means, that
such a coordinate Ri is not equal to the well-known
space-coordinate R, which we can measure inside of our cosmos.
Along just this forth dimension, all the relatively elementary
cosms are given together in a receptacle cosm of higher
functions, which has a higher coordinate system of three
dimensions again, but which aren't equal to the dimensions of
the elementary cosms. This makes a complicated hierarchy of
cosms! But the combining dimension of the elementary cosms is
always relatively just the forth dimension, but never a
higher dimension, may be, you count the hierarchy-planes; this
means, you count how deep do the cosm hierarchies run
completely.
Using three hierarchy-planes, there would be five
dimensions. The first feature of cosms is three-dimensional, g
& s (gravitons and subtrons). We are inside of them.
To exceed a gravition, there is the fourth dimension to arrive
the inside of p & e (protons and electrons). Then we are in
the receptacle cosm of them. We overcome now the particle's
fifth dimension and arrice the superordinated cosm (our
universe). We cannot overcome the universe going to God.
This kind of counting has no real
sense because the coordinate systems do not come out of each
other continuously. Every transition is a pass over the fourth
dimension. More it isn't.
Muons are my witnesses in this
link.
Why do today's scientists interpret, that the time would be
the fourth coordinate?
Obviously, they start from the following thinking. Till
now, you could surely measure a way coordinate. Since
Einstein's relativity this coordinate is dependent on the
speed. Along increasing velocity, the time can be dilated or
shortened relatively to the observer's position. Totally
obviously, you mean now, that the time would become just a totally
different extension than the way coordinate. Consequently, it
should be another dimension, namely the fourth. This thinking
is supported by the opinion, the increasing speed would
shorten the way coordinate.
According to my model, there the observer's positions is
not seen correctly. The dilation of a time step means the run
of less time, and it does not mean a longer time. Way
shortening really means the run of less way. So the
time-dilation and the way-shortening are the same change,
namely the common reduce of the dimensions of time & way.
Recognizing this, you please should read my
articles
about speed. You will see there, that the exchange of observer's
positions makes it possible to give a relativity, which is
able to be calculated, but which hat no sense - in my example:
a flight with warp speed, because you never has been flying
this kind, but you only can calculate such a crazy feature.
|