According to Quantum Theory, the electron has two gyromagnetic momenta:

g = 2 and g / 2 = 1.0011596 .

The first term means that the real magnetic momentum of an electron's oscillation has to be the double magnitude referred to Bohr's magneton (page 393 of my theory TBA I). The second term tells us that Bohr's magneton is really exceeded for this factor (page 538 of my theory, plus page 392, page 402). The "polarizing of vacuum" would be the reason. For the deviations, one sets this "polarizing" of "virtual charges" and those virtual compensation with fault calculation and gets the measured amounts over the approximated math model. Is this a giant success? Certainly it is, mathematically. Unfortunately, the equations are divergent. They are no models for the expexted "united or unified field theory" (page 373-391 of my theory).

But Quantum Mechanics has mistaken again in terminology. The found polarizing is not the real polarizing of any vacuum, but this is the polarizing of the real subparticles, which are rotating inside the electron up to the amplitude of the radius of 3.86e-13 m. If the electron wouldn't be negatively charged with one integer charge, then all its positive and negative subparticles would be distributed equally. There were no polarizing, no shift of charges, no interaction to the outside. I tell this sphere to be a "mass block". It only has mass, but no electric and electromagnetic effects.

But the subparticles aren't antiparticles. Therefore they don't make vacuum. There is no vacuum problem. When a further negative charged subparticle appears at the inside then it presses away the negative charges and attracts the positive subparticles. Consequently, the ideal equal distribution of the mass block will be disturbed. This reality has been calculated correctly by physics but not seen so. Just like this problem we have to see the fault calculations between the electron levels of hydrogen which cause the Lamb shift. Mathematics are correct, but the models aren't!

Additionally, the orbits of the subparticle of the subparticle shift the e. m. effects once more (TBA III).