Present thesis: Scientist shoot ions at each other and get
energies more and more next to the apparent "Big
Bang". While this, so-called "new particles"
are observed and "proofs" are "found"
confirming the hypothetical structure of matter.
My position: So how I gave the sentence above next to the
present interpretations, all this is nonsense.
In the end I'll give a prediction what one will really find
in these experiments.
Here are my arguments and theses, just in agreement to
valid laws of nature and to present observations:
1. New Particles
There aren't new particles. Matter cannot
be destroyed or produced. The laws of conservation prove this
(lepton conservation, baryon conservation; energy
conservation).
When protons get energy, then they keep
being protons, because they are identical bodies - microcosms.
Though, these protons then have different energy levels (their
spheres vibrate faster). We may think, there would be
different particles, heavier and unstable. But only the name
was changed describing this new state or level of the proton
made unstable. The perfect proton has
remained a destabilized proton!
If the changed unstable particle decays, it
does not form new particles but pairs of well-known particles.
This means that the energy coming free leads to the pair formation
of well-known particles. Particle pairs consist of their
particles and antiparticles. If the energy is very high, the
antiparticle and the particle are made in the features of
unstable states, even unknown.
However, the balance of these particle
pairs is zero observing the existence of pairs. Pairs are
meeting themselves and radiating into pure energy, so into
electromagnetic wavequanta (photons). Then the pairs are
disappeared again. On the contrary way, the energies of
photons form particle pairs. These are not new pairs, because
they don't change the total balance of particles and energy of
universe!
This means: When an interaction has just
gone at the inside of a proton, then that energy, which is set
free there, will be forming particle pairs at the outside,
which will be a reflector of the internal relationship. So we
never can make subparticles at the outside of protons directly
made as result of the coming out of these particles from the
inside. From the inside, nothings of the proton comes out, because particles
like protons are stable Black White Holes. They only let pass
the surplus energies in equality or parity, which form then
these particle pairs of outside world using the given
particles from here at the outside.
If scientists examine that
"gluon-quark-plasma", then they observe the energy
equivalents of the real subparticles. But they don't know
anything about the quantity of these subparticles.
Additionally, the conclusion from this to the Big Bang is wrong. Remark, these temperatures at which they get the
information about the energy of subparticles of protons, only
rules inside of the protons! Inside there - inside of the
baryons - the Big Bang temperature would be given. But what is
it good for? There, the strongest interactions are running up
to the gravitons, which pair formation temperature of 2e31 K is next to
the hypothetical big-bang-temperature of 1e32 K.
Quantum physics has its remaining problem
with its mistake describing particles and wavequanta being
one common thing. Therefore, they think that gluons and quarks
would be particles although these phenomena are wavequanta
forming real particle pairs in our outside world. Those pairs
are only these well-known particles decaying into these stable
particles, which were injected before into a process of
destabilizing.
2. Proving Structure
Using wavequanta you can prove which energetic levels are
inside of the protons. But you cannot say how many levels are
there and where they come from if from particles or from their
inner wavequanta analogously to photons. It's impossible, why
outer reflections are analogous to photons and why they
immediately form unstable particle pairs on base of well-known
stable particles reflecting the inner energy level and
decaying into the stable particle pairs and annihilating in
the end.
Conclusion is wrong, matter had formed itself by chance
from quarks and gluons. On the one hand, such an opinion is a
rash conclusion. But on the other hand, you had to be able to
create matter during these experiments; this means: you had to
ignore conservation balance of baryons accidentally. If you
could do this, such "states" could be bound or
"melt together".
Who ever searches for this, if he already knows about my
theories, will senselessly waste his time.
Because the real particles are that non plus ultra of
balance, they (stable neutrinos, electrons and protons) cannot
be produced and destroyed. Their change into unstable states
is made by energy supply. Contrarily, this energy which got
free while decay produces zero-balanced particle pairs being
only mirror images of energy concentrations just existing in
particles or in the environment of particles. I call this a
kind of resonance to given oscillation energies. So every
energy, programmatically given by the existence of stable
particles and working between these particles (like pion
energy), makes the base of reflection of features of unstable
particles. While this, it doesn't remain fermions (like muons,
hyperons) but also groups of particle pairs are connected to
common phenomena (bosons) like mesons for example. Inside of
mesons, destabilized states of electrons and positrons (these
are antielectrons) are rotating around each other connected
with wavequanta which make deriving an apparent resting mass.
Without actions of wavequanta of gravitation, mesons would
not have any resting mass, 'cause one electron from matter and
one positron from antimatter compensate the resting mass into
zero, logically proved by annihilation of both particles into
photons without resting mass! The direct experimental proof is
missing for antimass of positrons. But this experiment you
cannot make with mesons and antimesons because antimesons are
only apparent antis. Weak force is made by the exchange
of protocosms of the leptons inside of baryons while
annihilations of antis. This processes are reversible if
energy forms pairs of leptons and antileptons which restaurate
the leptons by energy and protocosms.
3. The Prediction:
The result of the scattering experiment at highest energies
will be the production of a macroscopic
Protocosm
how I describe it. This means that the complete energy of the
well-known unstable particles and the given destabilized
particles (no gluons, no quarks, but their energetic
equivalents in the feature of the well-known particles
existing now as extremely destabilized states) is connected
now. In this moment, a Black Hole will be born. Immediately, it
will decay in the feature of a White Hole after a small time
period dependent on its size (5 mm amplitude mean only twice 1.7e-11
s). All the pairs will be annihilated into the energy supplied
before. Remaining particles will confirm the conservation
balance of matter. This event will prove my theory of forming
protocosms and decay of them! All the other hypotheses about
which would happen there like eating the earth by the black
micro hole etc. won't be confirmed. So this will disprove old
theories of presence.