Today, one remarks, a "Big Bang" would give the consequence of an expansion of the "original world." The effect of the mass attraction could turn the movement under certain circumstances, whereby the universe also could concentrate itself. S. W. Hawking is straying from this idea. His space now should eternally expand in accordance with the alleged "Big Bang".

However, each simple person knows well more then a sly philosopher. He surely knows that on one year follows the next, etc. Everything of this world is connected with a going to and back. States are changing and turning again on a new manner. These things are shown by the oscillation! Therefore however the individual state is to find in the general state of the universe!

My United Field Theory gives different declarations in relationship to the present sciences that wants to see the genius of the presence essentially in Hawking.

Basically each cosm swings, it rather oscillates. So its space or its microcosms are oscillating! Is this premise also connected with a repetition of a "Big Bang"? No, the course is much more complicated. Therefore, you already can see the old theories only as primitive constructions: Bang - and the matter runs apart, Bang - and it thunders together again - completely as a mash? That already is a quite coarse of contemplation manner, out of that you hardly can interpret the multiplicity of the phenomena, if you don't cite the substitute for the Creator that's the accidence.

Nevertheless of complicated connections, the new theory remains well comprehensible. Underneath, I’m giving here an illustration from my book and an explanation text:

Page 93:

Illustration 3; 5: Each Cosm in the Scheme of Basic Structure

1- Gravity radius r_o respectively incident horizon

2- Gravity center, center of gravitation

3- Cosm amplitude R_o (maximum of the free-setting of inside

mass at stability),     the negation horizon

4- Maximum parity orbit of a protocosm over ½R_o, path of the light

5- Area of the vacuum sphere R_o = r_o - R_o

Each light that is starting from the point 2 only can reach the maximum of the orbit as it is shown at the designation of 4.

            ...

Scientists suspect now several universes and "big bangs" side by side. This thesis is close to my theory. But as long as they don't rule out the "Big Bang Theory", they will get nothing. No cosm seed is banging! You see it at the quasars: Spooky energy quantities stream from them. However, they are not in form of fogs, but in form of pairs from a subordinate handful of cosm seeds, which are setting free local energies. The temperatures of these energies nevertheless don't reach to hypothetical 10³² Kelvin like in the Big Bang, but only to the maximum of 6 billion Kelvin from the electron-positron-annihilation – the origin of the gamma radiation in series of lightning.

The "Quantum Theory" therefore leads to a fictive origin of the movement connections of the particles, to a pure energetic origin! To an origin, which locally and temporarily never existed this way!

So I mean: The "Quantum Theory" reflects energy levels by means of their waves on which temperature level the particle certainly exists few-wisely. This way, it also explains, which particle types are at these pure levels on scale. Each unstable particle can approach itself at such a standard, but it can never give up its programmed identity. Now it seems so, as you made a fraction distillation and win differently high scalding fat at different temperatures. Who wants to claim now, that at the highest temperature of this process all fats have their origin in this one high scalding fat? For example: lard and food oil are mixed and heated at 300 °C. Then both is miscellaneously liquid and physically without difference. Do both fats origin now from of 300 °C? No, they don't! We heat them both until they are separating themselves into their particles. Does their programmatic ancestry lay approximately there? No, also they don't! Now we heat both fats even at almost 10³² Kelvin. Maybe do they come from there programmatically? Finally, no!

Each thing is formed out from the stable particles. And likewise, all particles are formed from isolated particles. Does the isolation come out from a stability into the outside? No. However lard descends of the pig and oil descends for example of seeds of sunflowers. At 10° C lard gets solid, the oil around swims inside. At -16 °C then also the oil was getting solid. Has the oil turned into lard then? No, it has not!

Why therefore do we deduce all matter from the hottest of all particles on the basis of a temperature scale in the matter of existing particles at an assumption of the "Big Bang", if however the particles live according to an inside construction principle? Scientists want to standardize and to orientate themselves at the alleged accidence and they don't know how! This way, the sunflower oil should come accidentally from the sunflower seeds and the lard should also accidentally com from the pig.

However: The cosm theory ELECTROGRAVITATION explains the origin really!

Each stable particle is given as an elementary base. Particles move through the existing vacuum. Furthermore, they are implied below different particle surfaces. They form a hierarchy of systems. Never any stable particle is possible to change itself by energy support into different stable particles! Alone at the weak force, the effect changes to a conversion those peculiarities have nothing to do with a "particle melting point."

An unstable particle only decays into the direction that leads to the stable particle, if it also has the opportunity, therefore if it doesn't move with light speed in but with less. That temperature scale also doesn't tell us:

At the inside of the local stars, the temperature amounts to about 2 x 10¹³ Kelvin of the stable proton annihilations falling to about 10¹⁰ Kelvin of stable electron annihilation. Running to the surface, the temperature is falling on some thousand Kelvin.

At the isolated inside of the particle, which exists in the proton, to organize the protocosms, the temperature is crucially higher. It reaches to that suspected and of me calculated 2.4 x 10³¹ Kelvin of the origin (of that Small Bang inside the particle). That is the temperature of forming pairs of gravitons (subtrons will be formed at 10²⁸ K). However, here into our universe area, we never find high temperatures in such a way! To the parceling of our stars, it gets right cold anyway. Never there was a hot "Big Bang", but a cold zero walk through the central area of the universe in analogy of the winter! After this surrounding, the PK open themselves and evaporate. This is the first Small Bang.