The
Universe - a Hierarchy of different kinds of "Black
Holes"
Again and again, I read publications about those "Black
Holes" in galaxy cores (bdw 9/02). Who doesn't own
the United Theory of Fields only can conclude from
observations about such things - and ... - can be mistaken,
naturally. My theory shows: all
the galaxies have "Black White Holes" in their
centers and not only there! The question is, how
the so-called Black Hole is described by that Unified
Field Theory.
In my theory, the Black Hole is not black and not
stationary. It is a
non-stationary - better: it is an oscillating object,
while the complete present physics interprets
Schwarzschild's solution as stationary object.
The non-stationary Black White
Hole was named by me to be a feature of a COSMOS.
Stable cosms are oscillating spherically and
harmonically. To keep stable, they eject energy, which
was supported to them before. The stable elementary
particles like protons and electrons, but also our
complete universe - the macrocosm - I count to them!
Proton's spheres vibrate 2.2·1023 times per
second. The universe oscillates every 17.6 billion years
for one pulse of half a period. Universe isn't flat!
Observers conclude the universe seem to be open and flat
(cf. bdw 6/2001), because they don't know my model IOT. They
draw their conclusions like those
observers on Earth thousand years before, when they
thought the Earth would be flat.
Unstable cosms are the results of destabilizations of
stable cosms, which now oscillate faster and
represent more mass. Such unstable particles do not
decay in the sense of the word "decay", but
they give free parities of matter, which particle balance
is zero. That the stable
particle, which was destabilized and the energy, which
was supported for this process remain in the end. Conservation laws are
valid for baryons, leptons and for energy: Nobody can
produce or destroy the particles as protons, electrons and
stable neutrinos already existing in universe. The sum
of energy remains constant.
Bigger compounds of unstable particles are forming
another feature of unstable cosm, which really can DECAY in
the sense of this word into single particles and their
energies. This kind of unstable compound cosm I call Protocosm,
briefly PK (from German sign "Protokosmos").
For example, Mesons as unstable particles are pre-states of protocosms!
The universe is a system fulfilled of cosms
and protocosms. Each
subsystem consists of protocosms, subprotocosms and
their subprotocosms and so on into a depth of structure,
which programs the origin. There
is the cosmic information inside!
Let's take the example of protocosms in the centers
of all galaxies, all stars and all their substructures:
While such a PK is expanding and falling apart, it
evaporates, radiates and emits subprotocosms on their journey,
objects which become to new stars and their subsystems
during their own decay. In this state, the PK is open,
but extremely dense, especially in its center. There, a
divergent sphere DS is arising with a density near the theoretical
kind of the theoretic "Black Hole". Innumerable stars
rotating in its neighborhood are falling to that
divergent sphere. They give
it its food. While the DS gets denser this way, its
horizon starts to fall again. A twin of 2 PK will be
formed then in the center of that DS, which reaches a divergent
state to the "Black Hole". Because the matter
is falling from the outside, my theory solutes this
fall-process to be divergent. The velocity of falling
matter,
never reaches vacuum light velocity exactly. Therefore, this kind
of cosm is never completely closed or locked. It never
reaches the theoretical horizon of a Black Hole. The radius of a PK is never equal to the gravitational
radius of a Black Hole, but always a little bit larger.
This is decisive for this reason, that the PK can fall apart
again while a time period, which is as short as the forming time
was - some times extremely short. Therefore, the PK runs through
half a period of an oscillation - through one single
pulse then. This is enough to be right speaking of an
oscillation, because the PK has different qualities
during this short time.
Insides of the PK, the matter will be formed out
following the laws becoming a hierarchical structure of
subprotocosms and of their subs etc. The PK works like a
cleaning equipment and like a sorting device while it is
contracting respectively condensing.
Present physicists think of contraction of cosms
simply of falling matter - all together - when it is
heating up. According to my IOT model, this
is not right. While the contraction, subprotocosms are
formed. In this objects themselves, sub-subprotocosms
are made, etc., down to the hierarchy, which seems to be
unlimited, but has a programed limit in the end. All the
PK have fundamentally one or more electric charges. The
just made sub-PK are surely falling to the center of its
PK while they contract (condense) themselves. That space, which is
necessary in the center, shrinks together to a
minimum. There, the sub-PK do not collide, but they
rotate apart following the movement's laws of electric
charges of particles. Here, they arrive the proximity
of vacuum light velocity. Then they climb up again and
strive apart. This way the sub-PK start opening
(evaporating)
themselves, firstly in the center of the PK and then
upwards. The last locked sub-PK were supported by that energy, which
they got before, when they were built. So they can fly
far away and make an image as if the world would be
inflated.
Therefore, such a PK-pair-production in the
DS of the center of a galaxy is not stationary.
Stationary seems to be the quality of the Dvergent
Sphere. During this short time
generating a PK pair by contracting and an expanding DS,
the state of gravitation is vibrating.
Gravitational relations
of the PK inside are locked completely. The internal
gravitation then cannot be measured from the outside!
Just the same as no light can get to the outside. At the
outside, the PK only can be measured following the
equation: m = h f / c². That mass m of the PK then is a
function of its spherical frequency f. Planck's quantum
h and the vacuum velocity of light c are constants. The
mass M, which is packed inside the PK, is calculated at the outside
with the mass m according that equation of constants: m = 4.7x10-16
kg² / M. This way, our Sun of the mass of M = 2x1030
kg could be a PK of the mass of m = 2.35x10-
46 kg (as this object decayed, from the subs,
the planets and from the sub-subs the satellites of the
planets came out, etc. down to the pre-states of life;
in the center the rest of the PK remained - our
proto-sun).
The return from such a big mass to such a
insignificantly small mass reflects the discontinuity of
the mass of the PK. Naturally, you
can miss your chance to observe it, which has happened
today. Though, this detail is decisive! The
discontinuity of gravitation decides about the complete
constitution and about the evolution laws of universe
and of matter which is there!
PK will be energetically changed while their
existence. They can get weaker. PK then are hardly able
to eject their subs far away (PK also can die out). You
see it at our Sun. It collected enough gas and
rest-structures of first sub-PK to its proximity, which
today make its observable and shining Sun surface. Our
star doesn't eject proto-planets anymore, but Sun spots
and protuberances. Also our Earth surprises us only with
vulcano, which show us sub-PK's movements of the past.
You see that stars also have rests of protocosms and
a protocosm-production in the DS centers, because
mostly a pulsar results from supernova. I called the
pulsar a naked star core - and so a naked DS generating protocosms. But
such naked it isn't, although it has less shell than
before as star. In its center there is the DS producing protocosm
pairs, which stand in relationship with its relatively weak
shell. The radiation, which was induced by the producing
and vibrating DS, leads to the electromagnetic quanta in pulse
periods.Obviously, that DS is too weak to produce strong
PK. Its PK just reach the surface, where they evaporate
and radiate.
The brain like also the eye - all these phenomena are
parts of the programed pre-functions of protocosms. I
cannot be surprised at their "evolution".
Protocosms open up themselves and make a new world,
which is changing by interactions. During this, all
becomes
subtly differentiated and developed on. Therefore, there
was no single and creative Big Bang of human beings 50,000 years ago,
as it is asserted (cf. bdw 7/2002)
More articles about these themes, you can find below "Errors
of Main-Stream-Physics".
Arcus, corrected article 01-31-2021
|