Higgs-Particles or H°-Bosons
Simply said, Prof. Higgs thought
these bosons are missing yet to explain the resting mass
of the material elementary particles. There should be a
sea filled with such H-bosons, in which massless particles
had to cross. While swimming through the sea, some mass would
stick at them by H-bosons contacting or collecting them,
however.
Massless particles would be massive
by reception of H-bosons.
Physicists must everything explain
accidentally. Doing this, they make it especially hard:
accidentally massless particles should collect some
boson mass.
If the universe was filled of
H-bosons in the beginning, why is there this selection?
And now, living In present, why are there particles with resting mass
and particles without?
Scientists just can explain this by
accidents. They are not able to explain the amounts of
masses. That H-particle supports an assumption of mass,
not more. This assumption is even correct. But the
complete connection is interpreted or explained
absolutely wrong. This model is unreal and
distorted.
The view way is
absolutely naive about what mass will be at all.
But my idea is much simpler: mass is my expression of
the efforts of things to each other, because they were
separated before!
The increase or less of this effort,
then depend how strong is the separation. Mass then
is no more a thing,
which one can gather like the
physicists wanted to see it. Mass isn't material!
If we put a greater vessel, then more material fits
there. This is the experience of life. But is it
correct? Is this right as follows: the bigger a thing, the heavier
is it? Does this match on all things in the universe?
Just this is the problem. The naive way of thinking
of Einstein-physicists should actually be a
little bit better than Einstein. But really, however,
they are far away, back behind him. They always
think themselves, mass would be a volume.
However, the crucial point is: mass is the result of an
oscillation, the correlation between dispersion and
collection, between disconnection and connection!
Therefore but only in the retinue of my theory, elementary
particles have a bigger mass with their smaller
radius, however!
And now lets use my theory to
explain the problems.
Particles are spatially vibrating
bubbles. At their horizon, their degree of the
gravitation changes in an opposite development. This
means, they seem to work differently to the outside than
to the inside. The mass packed inside has an effect on the
outside as reciprocal, converted about a constant, valid
for particles. Otherwise, it must be varied with a factor. The proton,
which weighs at its outside about 10e-27 kilogram of resting mass, disposes
inside about 280 billion kilogram of packed rest mass!
Consequently, the amount of the inner mass determines the
outside mass. If two particles like the protons are shot
at each other with enormous energy, they aren't
destroyed. They don't shatter. Such assumptions of the
present science of proton shattering are
incorrect.
According my model, the reason is
as follows: never particles meet on each other, but their wave quanta do
it. These quanta produce new particle pairs, actually
known particle pairs, which are forming combinations
again to show the energy, which became just effective from
the momentum energy of the collision. They are only shown
by their wavequantum interactions. This means: wave quanta are everything, which we
can watch. And these are
analoga to the photons to electromagnetic wave packages
and to my gravitomagnetic wave quanta as fallons. At
this, a reflection is
escorted to the outside by the inside of the proton, a
photo of an extremely small moment, by the fact
that projections arise on the outside, here by the W-
and Z-bosons, now also so-called bosons, especially by
H-bosons. You can shot a photo of every physical state
inside of a proton by extremely energetic collision's
effects. But the turn of these you do not know. To do
this is the hardest work without a concept.
Because protocosms are charged in
the first rotation circle 1s of the subparticles in the
proton, one positively charged in proton and negatively
charged in antiproton and one negatively charged in
proton and positively charged in antiproton, we get W+ bosons and W-
bosons as projection of pair formation. Their projection
will appear as charged W. Both show the lowest energy of
80.38 GeV, which is converted at this.
According my theory, that's the way, because
the lowest mass of one protocosm there is given on
the highest inner orbit (2s) level in the proton. The
mass M is bigger the deeper is the path of the orbit. Two
protocosms charged positively and one negatively are running
there in orbit 2s. Their projection is the Z°
boson. This is already an expression of bigger mass in
the proton on the second path to the inside with 91.18
GeV/c². With these three protocosms everything makes up its mind the simply positive cargo load of the proton
and the almost triple magnetic momentum. Color charges
of so-called "quarks" come from themselves.
Quantum leaps are "quarks" without including the masse
block!
So have a look at my new discovery of
the year 2020:
https://www.no-quarks.com
Physics do not know my packing
order, my hierarchy order of matter, the inside and the
outside with its reciprocal shape!!!
This way the
scientists have single fotos. But I have the video - the
movie - for it - the
conception!
Arcus
on July 12th 2012 in answer to the discovery of the
Higgs-boson "No. 1" and on September 15th 2018
to mass
www.arcusuniverse.com
|