Higgs-Particles or H°-Bosons
Simply said Prof. Higgs thought
these bosons are missing yet to explain the resting mass
of the material elementary particles. There should be a
sea filled with such H-bosons which massless particles
had to cross. While swimming through some mass would
stick to them by H-bosons contacting or collecting
Massless particles would be massive
by reception of H-bosons.
Physicists must explain everything
accidentally. Doing this they make it especially hard:
Accidentally massless particles should collect some
If the universe was filled of
H-bosons in the beginning why is there this selection?
In present, why are there particles with resting mass
and particles without?
Scientist just can explain this ba
accidents. They are not able to explain the amounts of
masses. That H-particle supports an assumption of mass,
not more. This assumption is even correct. But the
complete connection is interpreted or explained
absolutely wrong. This model is unreal and
The view way is
absolutelynaive about which mass will be at all.
But my idea is much simpler: Mass is my expression of
the efforts of things to each other because they were
The increase or less of this effort
then depend how strong the separation is. Mass then
is no more a thing
which one can gather like the
physicists wanted to see it. Mass isn't material!
If we put a greater vessel, then more material fits
there. This is the experience of life. But is it
correct? Is this right: The bigger a thing the heavier
is it? Does this match on all things in the universe?
Just this is the problem. The naive way of thinking
of Einstein-physicists should actually a
little bit better than Einstein. But really, however,
they are far far remained back behind him. They always
think themselves, mass would be a volume.
However, the crucial point is: Mass is the result of an
oscillation, the correlation between dispersion and
collection, between disconnection and connection!
Therefore but only in the retinue of my theory, elementary
particles have a bigger mass with their smaller
And now lets use my theory to
explain the problems.
Particles are spatially vibrating
bubbles. At their horizon their degree of the
gravitation changes in an opposite development. This
means, they seem to work different to the outside than
to inside. The mass packed inside has an effect on the
outside as reciprocon, converted about a constant only
for stable particles. It must otherwise be varied with
the lambda factor. The proton with the outside of about
ten highly minus 27 kilograms of rest mass disposes
inside about 280 billions kilogram of packed rest mass!
Consequently the amount of the inner mass determines the
outside mass. If two particles like the protons are shot
at each other with enormous energy they aren't
destroyed. They don't shatter. Such assumptions of the
present science of proton shattering are
The reason in my theory is: Never
particles meet on each other but their wave quanta do
it. These quanta produce new particle pairs, actually
known particle pairs, which are forming combinations
again to show the energy which got just effective from
the pulse energy of the collision. They are only shown
by their wavequantum interactions. This means: Wave
quanta are everything which we watch. And these are
analoga to the photons to electromagnetic wave packages.
At this a reflection is
escorted to the outside by the inside of the proton, a
foto of an extremely small moment, by the fact
that projections arise on the outside, here by the W-
and Z-bosons, now also so-called bosons, especially by
H-bosons. You can shoot a foto of every physical state
inside of a proton by extremely engergetic collision's
effects. But the turn of these you do not know. To do
this is the hardest work without a concept.
Because protocosms are charged in
the first rotation circle of the subparticles in the
proton, one positively charged in proton and negatively
charged in antiproton, we get W+ bosons and W-
bosons as projection of pair formation. Their projection
will appear as charged W. Both show the lowest energy of
80.39 GeV which is converted at this.
After my theory therefore, because
the lowest mass of the one protocosm there is given on
the highest inner orbit (1s) level in the proton. The
mass is bigger the deeper is the train of the orbit. Two
protocosms charged positively and negatively are running
there in orbit 2 (2s). Their projection is the Z°
boson. This is already an expression of bigger mass in
the proton on the second train to inside with 91.19
GeV/c². With these three protocosms everything makes up
his mind the simply positive cargo load of the proton
and the almost triple magnetic momentum. Color charges
of so-called "quarks" come from themselves. PK
are "quarks" without including the masse
And there I thought of a mass block
- where are all the innumerable protocosms which are
below the second orbit and which become more and more
and heavier in mass amounts. This mass-block by its
third orbit (2p with 12 PK in 3 areas of the space) at
the inside of the proton is reflected by the H°-boson
of approx. 125 GeV energy of one PK formation and
acceleration by energy.
However, I earlier thought, protons
would be quantized much coarser than universe open
space. If we start out from this hypothesis, then there
would be more than one H-boson. About these energies:
1046,30 GeV with about 1000 GeV
Higgs-boson was originally predicted.
Proton has a resting mass of
1.6726218E10-27 kg. Using my theory inside mass is
2.8321E11 kg, about 280 billion!!
Inside a proton its mass block is not formed by one
single Higgs boson, but by 12. Added the three lonely PK
(which are "quarks") we have 15 PK inside of a
But: H-Bosons of leptons have quite
different amounts to the proton-mass block amounts. What
ever will follow from them?
This may be complicated. But only
in such a way a shoe will be made which also can put on
from the mass of the particles. The present explanations
are very vague and they will still remain. They don't
earn the hustle and bustle which is organized around
them. God has designed the world as complicatedly as
only possibly at all. As simple, as scientists have
thought by their "standard model", the world
absolutely isn't because they have made some mistakes on
their way uncovered just by my solutions.
This time in the year 2018 they
shot a foto of the appearance of mass inside of a
proton. This now would be the final proof to Higgs'
theoretical assumptions. And this is again just a flash
of a tiny moment. But in this moment bosons do not have
collected this mass. They got not massive! They stay
In just this moment protocosms
were opened by anticollapses distributing their inner
mass. From a tiny outside mass of such a protocosm,
which is not calculated at this collider, the almost
"nothing" changed into a gigantic mass
observed and detected.
Once again: Protocosms with
nearly zero mass m open up themselves and bring out
their inside mass M. So from extremely less mass m
becomes much mass M!
Physics do not know my packing
order, my hierarchy order of matter, the inside and the
outside with its reciprocal shape!!!
This way the
scientists have single fotos. But I have the video - the
movie - for it - the
on July 12th 2012 in answer to the discovery of the
Higgs-boson "No. 1" and on September 15th 2018