Home

ARCUS:  The World Formula and its Solutions

Consequently constructed using the results of Albert Einstein and Max Planck leading to the Unified Field Theory

 
Articles
The Preaching
 
 
 
 
  

Higgs-Particles or H°-Bosons

Simply said, Prof. Higgs thought these bosons are missing yet to explain the resting mass of the material elementary particles. There should be a sea filled with such H-bosons, in which massless particles had to cross. While swimming through the sea, some mass  would stick at them by H-bosons contacting or collecting them, however.

Massless particles would be massive by reception of H-bosons.

Physicists must everything explain accidentally. Doing this, they make it especially hard: accidentally massless particles should collect some boson mass.

If the universe was filled of H-bosons in the beginning, why is there this selection? And now, living In present, why are there particles with resting mass and particles without?

Scientists just can explain this by accidents. They are not able to explain the amounts of masses. That H-particle supports an assumption of mass, not more. This assumption is even correct. But the complete connection is interpreted or explained absolutely wrong. This model is unreal and distorted. 

The view way  is absolutely naive about what mass will be at all. But my idea is much simpler: mass is my expression of the efforts of things to each other, because they were separated before!

The increase or less of this effort, then depend how strong is the separation. Mass then is no more a thing, which one can gather like the physicists wanted to see it. Mass isn't material! If we put a greater vessel, then more material fits there. This is the experience of life. But is it correct? Is this right as follows: the bigger a thing, the heavier is it? Does this match on all things in the universe?
Just this is the problem. The naive way of thinking of Einstein-physicists should actually be a little bit better than Einstein. But really, however, they are far away, back behind him. They always think themselves, mass would be a volume.

However, the crucial point is: mass is the result of an oscillation, the correlation between dispersion and collection, between disconnection and connection! Therefore but only in the retinue of my theory, elementary particles have  a bigger mass with their smaller radius, however!

And now lets use my theory to explain the problems.

Particles are spatially vibrating bubbles. At their horizon, their degree of the gravitation changes in an opposite development. This means, they seem to work differently to the outside than to the inside. The mass packed inside has an effect on the outside as reciprocal, converted about a constant, valid for particles. Otherwise, it must be varied with a factor. The proton, which weighs at its outside about 10e-27 kilogram of resting mass, disposes inside about 280 billion kilogram of packed rest mass! Consequently, the amount of the inner mass determines the outside mass. If two particles like the protons are shot at each other with enormous energy, they aren't destroyed. They don't shatter. Such assumptions of the present science of proton shattering are incorrect. 

According my model, the reason is as follows: never particles meet on each other, but their wave quanta do it. These quanta produce new particle pairs, actually known particle pairs, which are forming combinations again to show the energy, which became just effective from the momentum energy of the collision. They are only shown by their wavequantum interactions. This means: wave quanta are everything, which we can watch. And these are analoga to the photons to electromagnetic wave packages and to my gravitomagnetic wave quanta as fallons. At this, a reflection is escorted to the outside by the inside of the proton, a photo of an extremely small moment, by the fact that projections arise on the outside, here by the W- and Z-bosons, now also so-called bosons, especially by H-bosons. You can shot a photo of every physical state inside of a proton by extremely energetic collision's effects. But the turn of these you do not know. To do this is the hardest work without a concept.

Because protocosms are charged in the first rotation circle 1s of the subparticles in the proton, one positively charged in proton and negatively charged in antiproton and one negatively charged in proton and positively charged in antiproton,  we get W+ bosons and W- bosons as projection of pair formation. Their projection will appear as charged W. Both show the lowest energy of 80.38 GeV, which is converted at this. 

According my theory, that's the way, because the lowest mass of one protocosm there is given on the highest inner orbit (2s) level in the proton. The mass M is bigger the deeper is the path of the orbit. Two protocosms charged positively and  one negatively are running there in orbit 2s. Their projection is the Z° boson. This is already an expression of bigger mass in the proton on the second path to the inside with 91.18 GeV/c². With these three protocosms everything makes up its mind the simply positive cargo load of the proton and the almost triple magnetic momentum. Color charges of so-called "quarks" come from themselves. Quantum leaps are "quarks" without including the masse block!

So have a look at my new discovery of the year 2020: https://www.no-quarks.com

Physics do not know my packing order, my hierarchy order of matter, the inside and the outside with its reciprocal shape!!!

 

This way the scientists have single fotos. But I have the video - the movie - for it - the conception!

 

Arcus on July 12th 2012 in answer to the discovery of the Higgs-boson "No. 1" and on September 15th 2018 to mass

www.arcusuniverse.com

 

 
· All rights reserved: Arcus (Heinz-Joachim Ackermann, since1998) ·